Buy Now Pay Later: How Klarna is Fuelling a Spending Crisis
Image Credit: Julio Lopez Via Pexels
For a generation steeled by unprecedented economic uncertainty, the word ‘debt’ is synonymous with predatory interest rates and labyrinthine fine print on credit cards. Enter Klarna and the Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) brigade, marketing themselves as the savvy, transparent antidote. They promise the dream of instant gratification without the sting of immediate payment, acting as the ideal solution for those with small bank accounts but big dreams. But behind this veneer of financial empowerment lies a more sinister reality: a service that isn't just enabling spending, but instead actively fuelling a crisis among its most vulnerable users.
Klarna may claim to discourage reckless consumption, but its customers' lived experiences tell a different story. Take Elysia Burman, who described her Klarna experience to The New York Times. Ambitious and envious of her peers' opulent lifestyles, Klarna gave her a way to indulge without visibly breaching a credit limit. For customers like Elysia, the Klarna hook of an undefined spending limit meant that her debts quietly amounted to $50,000 without her even realising what she actually owed. For her, purchasing with Klarna felt like “throwing gasoline on a burning fire”.
So, why is a generation seemingly so acutely aware of financial precarity falling into this trap? The answer lies in a potent cocktail of economic anxiety and psychological escapism.
As the anthropologist Malinowski observed, times of profound uncertainty often breed "magical thinking." And with a stifled housing market, sluggish wage growth, and a cost-of-living squeeze, the traditional path to financial security feels like a mirage for this demographic; a recent survey by Northwestern Mutual found that 53% of aspiring millennial homeowners believed they would never be able to afford a property. If the goalpost of a mortgage has vanished, where does that disposable income go? For a generation already grappling with lower financial literacy and higher unsecured debt, Klarna masterfully redirects their aspirations away from unattainable necessities towards immediately accessible luxuries. Its appeal is not in making young consumers become financially secure, but in making them feel that way instead.
This has given rise to the recent phenomenon of ‘financial manifestation.’ A quick search on TikTok bombards you with self-proclaimed psychics and manifestation coaches instructing followers that simply visualising anything from £10,000 to a Mini Kelly bag will make it materialise. The platform is now flooded with "Klarna hauls" as users showcase their deferred-debt spoils. One user’s haul captured the delusion perfectly: “it makes me think I have money - more money than what I have.”
Promising no hidden fees or interest, Klarna lets shoppers believe they’re avoiding debt, yet its fine print tells a different story. Much like Airbnb’s furtive fees, consumers end up financing holidays and retail splurges rather than investments, mistaking performativity for affordability. By treating the purchases of today like the problems of tomorrow, entrepreneurial finance coach Dior Bediako pointed out how “[people’s] future self won’t be happy about [Klarna] but their present self will be very pleased.”
And therein lies the heart of the crisis. Klarna’s business model decouples purchasing from payment, creating a risky cognitive disconnect, akin to something right out of Black Mirror, for consumers already facing an uncertain economic future. By offering the illusion of affordability without the structure of tangible financial responsibility, Klarna isn't just catching fire on the spending habits of a generation, but it is systematically fanning the flames. The bill for today's curated lifestyle, much like the payments themselves, has been deferred. But when it is finally due, consumers may owe far more than just money.